Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: To compare flow cytometry with the established indirect immunobead binding test (IBT) for the detection of antisperm antibodies in seminal plasma. DESIGN: A prospective, comparative study. SETTING: University-based andrology unit. PATIENT(S): One hundred and fifty-eight men with suspected male factor subfertility. INTERVENTION(S): Seminal plasma samples were incubated with antisperm antibody-negative donor sperm. Surface-bound antibody was detected with fluorescence-labeled antihuman antibody in the flow cytometry assay or with immunobead-labeled antihuman antibody in the IBT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The percentage of sperm that tested positive for surface-bound antibody was determined in the two assays. Seminal plasma was antisperm antibody-positive when > or = 20% of the sperm were antibody-bound, and clinically significant levels were present when > or = 50% of the sperm were antibody-bound. RESULT(S): Of 71 samples that were negative by the IMT, 66 (93%) also were negative by flow cytometry. Of 63 samples that had > or = 50% immunobead binding, 55 had equivalent results by flow cytometry. Overall statistical analysis showed a good correlation between the two assays. CONCLUSION(S): There is a good correlation between the indirect IBT and indirect flow cytometry for the detection of antisperm antibodies in seminal plasma.


Journal article


Fertil Steril

Publication Date





1114 - 1119


Autoantibodies, Binding Sites, Antibody, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Immunoassay, Male, Prospective Studies, Semen, Spermatozoa