Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Key content Antenatal imaging is a screening tool integral to ensuring women are cared for in the most appropriate setting. The pretest probability of PAS should be considered before any imaging is performed. PAS is an iatrogenic disease. Any process which disrupts the endometrium increases the risk. Caesarean birth is the most common cause. Specialist placental assessment in asymptomatic women should be offered between 24 and 28 weeks. Ultrasound and MRI have similar diagnostic value, and MRI should only be used as an adjunct following ultrasound assessment by a specialist in placental imaging. Learning objectives To understand the pathophysiology of PAS. To understand the distinction between screening for and diagnosis of PAS. To increase confidence in the interpretation of sonographic features of PAS. To provide a rationale for PAS care being provided in centres of excellence. Ethical issues If women increasingly prefer caesarean section over vaginal birth, it is likely that this trend will result in increasing numbers of complex caesarean deliveries and PAS cases. Many studies have shown decreased morbidity and mortality if PAS cases are managed by an experienced multi‐disciplinary team (MDT) in a PAS centre of excellence; therefore, accurate screening and timely referral are vital to improve patient care for women with risk factors.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/tog.12956

Type

Journal article

Journal

The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

01/2025

Volume

27

Pages

15 - 28