Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Routine third-trimester ultrasound is frequently offered to pregnant women to identify fetuses with abnormal growth. Infrequently, a congenital anomaly is incidentally detected. OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence and type of fetal anomalies detected during routine third-trimester scans using a systematic review and meta-analysis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library) from inception until August 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA: Population-based studies (randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohorts) reporting abnormalities detected at the routine third-trimester ultrasound performed in unselected populations with prior screening. Case reports, case series, case-control studies and reviews without original data were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Prevalence and type of anomalies detected in the third trimester. We calculated pooled prevalence as the number of anomalies per 1,000 scans with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Publication bias was assessed. MAIN RESULTS: The literature search identified 9,594 citations; thirteen studies were eligible representing 141,717 women; 643 were diagnosed with an unexpected abnormality. The pooled prevalence of a new abnormality diagnosed was 3.68 per 1,000 (95% CI 2.72 - 4.78) women scanned. The largest groups of abnormalities were urogenital (55%), central nervous system abnormalities (18%) and cardiac abnormalities (14%). CONCLUSION: Combining data from 13 studies and over 140,000 women, we show that during routine third trimester ultrasound, an incidental fetal anomaly will be found in about 1 in 300 scanned women. This information should be taken into account when consenting women for third trimester ultrasound; and when designing and assessing cost of third trimester ultrasound screening programs.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/1471-0528.16468

Type

Journal article

Journal

BJOG

Publication Date

13/08/2020

Keywords

anomaly scan, congenital malformation, fetal abnormality, fetal anomaly, incidental finding, pregnancy care, systematic review, third-trimester