Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The increasing incidence of caesarean delivery (CD) has resulted in an increase in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), adversely impacting maternal outcomes globally. Currently, more than 90% of women diagnosed with PAS present with a placenta praevia (praevia PAS). Praevia PAS can be reliably diagnosed antenatally with ultrasound, and it is unclear whether magnetic resonance imaging improves diagnosis beyond what can be achieved by skilled ultrasound operators. Therefore, any screening programme for PAS will require improved training in the diagnosis of placental disorders and development of targeted scanning protocols. Management strategies for praevia PAS vary depending on the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis, findings at laparotomy and local surgical expertise. Current epidemiological data for PAS are highly heterogeneous, mainly due to wide variation in the clinical criteria used to diagnose the condition at birth. This significantly impacts research into all aspects of the condition, especially comparison of the efficacy of different management strategies.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.04.006

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2019-11-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

61

Pages

75 - 88

Total pages

13

Keywords

Caesarean hysterectomy, Increta, Percreta, Placenta accreta, Prenatal diagnosis, Ultrasound imaging, Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Placenta Accreta, Placenta Previa, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis