Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: RRT and doubling of serum creatinine are considered the objective hard end points in nephrology intervention trials. Because both are assumed to reflect changes in the filtration capacity of the kidney, drug effects, if present, are attributed to kidney protection. However, decisions to start RRT are not only on the basis of filtration capacity of the kidney, but also on other factors. We therefore compared the time to RRT with the time to a fixed eGFR threshold and assessed the effect of the renoprotective drug irbesartan on both components. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Post hoc analysis of two clinical trials, the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and Reduction of End points in Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan Trial, in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The time to a predefined eGFR level of 11 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (eGFR11), calculated by within-patient linear regression, was compared with the time to RRT or sustained serum creatinine ≥6 mg/dl. RESULTS: A large difference was observed in the median time to RRT (779 days) compared with eGFR11 (678 days; P=0.01). We also observed a large variation in the difference between the time to RRT and eGFR11. In IDNT, the hazard ratio for the effect of irbesartan on the serum creatinine ≥6.0 mg/dl end point was 0.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.39 to 0.91; P=0.02), whereas it was smaller for the RRT end point (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 1.07; P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a difference in the time to RRT and a fixed eGFR threshold, and shows that the effect of an angiotensin receptor blocker on a filtration-based end point versus RRT varies. This implies that evaluating renoprotective effects of drugs with a combined RRT and doubling of serum creatinine end point may result in evaluating other effects beyond renoprotection alone. Future trials should consider registering all parameters that lead to RRT decisions.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.2215/CJN.09590916

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2017-10-06T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

12

Pages

1595 - 1600

Total pages

5

Keywords

Angiotensin II, Biphenyl Compounds, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Humans, Linear Models, Losartan, Renal Replacement Therapy, Tetrazoles, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, irbesartan, kidney, nephrology, renal dialysis, Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers, Biomarkers, Biphenyl Compounds, Clinical Decision-Making, Clinical Trials as Topic, Creatinine, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Disease Progression, Endpoint Determination, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Health Status, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Irbesartan, Kidney, Linear Models, Losartan, Proportional Hazards Models, Renal Dialysis, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Research Design, Risk Factors, Tetrazoles, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Up-Regulation