Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Graphs and tables are indispensable aids to quantitative research. When developing a clinical prediction rule that is based on a cardiovascular risk score, there are many visual displays that can assist in developing the underlying statistical model, testing the assumptions made in this model, evaluating and presenting the resultant score. All too often, researchers in this field follow formulaic recipes without exploring the issues of model selection and data presentation in a meaningful and thoughtful way. Some ideas on how to use visual displays to make wise decisions and present results that will both inform and attract the reader are given. Ideas are developed, and results tested, using subsets of the data that were used to develop the ASSIGN cardiovascular risk score, as used in Scotland.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310210

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2017-04-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

103

Pages

538 - 545

Total pages

7

Keywords

Area Under Curve, Audiovisual Aids, Cardiology, Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinical Decision-Making, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Decision Support Techniques, Humans, Judgment, Models, Statistical, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors