Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Preterm delivery is the largest cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity, yet the treatment of preterm labour has not been demonstrated to improve outcome. The reasons are numerous and complex, but they include a failure to understand the mechanism(s) of preterm labour, the multitude of different causes, the difficulty in diagnosis and the problems of outcome measurement in clinical trials. Recently, an oxytocin antagonist (atosiban) has been introduced into clinical practice in Europe. Although it may be an effective tocolytic, a beneficial effect on perinatal outcome has not been demonstrated. Atosiban has an effect at both oxytocin and vasopressin (V(1a)) receptors, which (assuming efficacy) raises the question as to whether oxytocin or vasopressin V(1a) antagonism is required for tocolysis. This review examines the rationale for tocolysis in preterm labour, the evidence for administration of atosiban and the role for oxytocin, vasopressin and their receptors in the onset of labour. Experimental Physiology (2001) 86.2, 297-302.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1113/eph8602186

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2001-03-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

86

Pages

297 - 302

Total pages

5

Keywords

Female, Hormone Antagonists, Humans, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Oxytocin, Pregnancy, Vasotocin